A partially uncoiled film roll.
Essay
Beyond the Now: On Intellectuals, Revolutions, and Crisis Time

In reflecting on how writers, artists, and intellectuals have theorized the role of literature and film in times of crisis and revolutionary transformation, I was struck by a quote from renowned Senegalese writer and filmmaker Ousmane Sembène in an interview conducted by the Tunisian film critic Tahar Cheriaa. 

“But the mission, as far as the business of revolution is concerned, is not to “get it done” but to “get it started”! These are two very different things. We can’t, and neither should we, act as if we could achieve a revolution by just making films, as if our films were planning “documents” that viewers could use to execute a revolution masterminded by us, a revolution we would have spurred them into acting out. This is wishful thinking, nothing but ideological tomfoolery. We tend to think that the artist can pull off a revolution all on his own, or at least take part in it, get involved, etc. No, the artist is the one who lays the groundwork for revolutionary change; he’s the catalyst who sets the wheels in motion. What is more, even in the midst of a revolution in full steam, the true artist is the one who’s already paving the way for the next revolution or, if you will, the revolution called for by the inner workings of the system, and this is never lost on alert observers of the process, or at least those who never drink the Kool-Aid of conformism. That’s what I call a true artist. He pulls a lever, one among many, to spark a revolutionary dynamic, he inoculates others with the idea. That’s what he is needed for, that’s how he can achieve glory, but that’s also his shortcoming. Others will always make revolutions, just as he will always set the stage for it through clarifying, analyzing, revealing, and calling out things. He implants in the minds of others the clear conviction that revolution is necessary and feasible.” 

Speaking in 1974, in the wake of the independence of many African countries from colonial rule and amid ongoing national liberation struggles on the continent and beyond, Ousmane Sembène was addressing a moment shaped by decolonization, the Cold War, and the Global Sixties, when the word “revolution” was very much in the air. In this quote, Sembène shares his thoughts on the political role of the artist. Rather than imagining literature or film as instruments capable of executing political transformation, he reframes artistic practice as catalytic: the artist “sets the wheels in motion” and “inoculates others with the idea.” 

There is much to unpack in this passage. My aim here, however, is less to offer a full interpretation than to open it up for reflection. What might it mean, in our respective fields and lines of work, to act as “a catalyst who sets the wheels in motion”? How do we grapple with the tragi-glorious role Sembène assigns to the artist: one who prepares the ground for revolution but does not carry it out? Does this seemingly “humble” position risk obscuring the significance of the task at hand or does it, on the contrary, redefine where the true force of intellectual and artistic labor resides? 

In my research examining the work of writers and artists engaged in revolutionary cultural movements during the decolonization period, I argue that revolutionary failure does not mark the disappearance of revolutionary imaginaries. Rather, these imaginaries are deferred and remain available for reactivation at later historical moments. Such reactivations become possible through the traces left behind in cultural texts, aesthetic forms, ideas, and practices, which accumulate and sediment over time like latent deposits capable of resurfacing under new political and historical conditions. This suggests that the intellectual’s work in times of crisis does not always privilege immediacy; instead, it is oriented toward delayed, if not uncertain, gratification. 

In these circumstances, the intellectual must recognize that although their intervention is oriented toward the immediacy of crisis, its force may not lie in that “now” but in longer temporalities through which ideas are later reactivated and reworked in ways that exceed the crises they were originally intended to address.


 

Work Cited

Cheriaa, Tahar and Ousmane Sembène. “Issues in African Film: The Artist and the Revolution: ‘Interview with Ousmane Sembène’ in French.” Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 61, no. 2 (2020): 23–33.

Join the Colloquy
Colloquy

The Intellectual in a Time of Crisis

Curator

What is the responsibility of intellectuals in a world on fire? 

By vocation scholars are motivated to bring clarity out of confusion, light out of darkness. Even in a time of crisis, however, the work of ideas is sometimes slow, narrowly focused, and inconvenient or difficult to access. While it always belongs to the present as part of the remaking of knowledge that happens generation by generation, such work may show its relevance to the current moment in ways that are visible or only latent, perhaps obscure. Where the public seeks clear-cut answers, intellectual work often delivers contradiction and complexity.

more

Moreover, many scholars feel prompted not merely to join a public conversation but to inform and change it. Even so, they may encounter resistance from those who see them as isolated or privileged by knowledge.

In the months after this year’s Presidential Lecture by Tommie Shelby, which probed many aspects of these issues, we asked the members of the 2025-26 SHC cohort of Fellows to provide us with reflections answering this moment. Prompts we asked included: How do you conceive the relation of your intellectual work to the present moment? How does research in the humanities make a difference in society, in the broader culture, or over the longer term? And especially now, as we experience one crisis after another in the world, what brings you back to the practice of interpretation, argument, and analysis?

The responses, gathered in this Colloquy, range from the global to the hyperlocal, from ancient Greece to the twenty-first-century university campus, from California’s intertidal zones to warehouses in Georgia. While each of these pieces touches, at least in part, on some of the most harrowing aspects of our current moment, they also offer some glimmer of hope, whether it be a call to specific political or intellectual work on the part of scholars, an account of the activism that is already a core part of many scholarly pursuits, or simply a reminder that any individual scholar who chooses to use their work in this way is not alone.

This Colloquy aims to capture a tumultuous year in public life through the mirror of academic discourse as experienced across many fields and methods. Like all Colloquies, it invites conversation and contributions, and its work is never finished.

Join the Colloquy

My Colloquies are shareables: Curate personal collections of blog posts, book chapters, videos, and journal articles and share them with colleagues, students, and friends.

My Colloquies are open-ended: Develop a Colloquy into a course reader, use a Colloquy as a research guide, or invite participants to join you in a conversation around a Colloquy topic.

My Colloquies are evolving: Once you have created a Colloquy, you can continue adding to it as you browse Arcade.