Thoughts on Reading Joseph Levenson

Contrary to the menacing spectacle of national chauvinism associated with China today, Confucian universal values embodied by the idea of tianxia (all under heaven) stem from an ethical scheme of ritualistic empire.  This global view based on cultural improvement is a far cry from the image of modern empires bent on acquiring territories, markets and resources. 

As Joseph Levenson noted four decades ago, Confucian literati accepted cultural differences as the way of the world. Although they made a distinction between the civilized and barbarians, they were aware that “the barbarians are always with us.” The Confucian realm is supposed to be an open house: anybody can come in if they are excellent, like qualified athletes for the Olympic Games. The insiders, if they put their self-interest before the public good of “all under heaven,” should go away. Confucian universalism was “a criterion, a standpoint, not a point of departure,” as Levenson well put. Chinese left home to travel and settle in other countries, but “not one had any Confucian pretensions to be bearing out a Word,” as did Christian missionaries.

See Joseph Levenson, Revolution and Cosmopolitanism (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1971).

My Colloquies are shareables: Curate personal collections of blog posts, book chapters, videos, and journal articles and share them with colleagues, students, and friends.

My Colloquies are open-ended: Develop a Colloquy into a course reader, use a Colloquy as a research guide, or invite participants to join you in a conversation around a Colloquy topic.

My Colloquies are evolving: Once you have created a Colloquy, you can continue adding to it as you browse Arcade.