Caroline Bailey considers how teaching artist's books and book-making techniques in the classroom can create a more connected university and help mitigate the rise of student reliance on AI.
Caroline Bailey considers how teaching artist's books and book-making techniques in the classroom can create a more connected university and help mitigate the rise of student reliance on AI.
Burleson details the way she and her undergraduate narrative theory class performed a narrative analysis, along with a media and cultural studies analysis, of Lamar's half-time performance at the 59th Super Bowl.
In an interview with Arcade, D. Venkat Rao of the English and Foreign Languages University in Hyderabad discusses humanities research and pedagogy in non-Western spaces, particularly classrooms in South Asia.
As we close out this series of reports on the Humanities Core (HumCore) Workshops, it is worth returning to the two questions that have driven every session so far: 1. Can we conceptualize the Global Humanities at all? 2. How have our ideas created teaching structures in California, Karachi, and Singapore?
Though many of us are frequently concerned with what we’re currently teaching and why, and though we might have strong opinions about what ought to be taught in the coming years, fewer of us have a comprehensive understanding of how the past century of institutional approaches to curriculum design has contributed to our present circumstances.
How might one design or adapt a course to make it more responsibly global? How might we teach important texts, long disappeared into the morass of the “canon,” in such a way that highlights their inherent globality and renders them new?
When things fall apart, when societal deterioration accompanies imperial collapse, we become disillusioned, disenchanted, and this emerges in our literature, art, and philosophy. But how might this disillusionment extend to our pedagogy?